|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set polar opposites. First, we put down on paper an end-to-end diagram with “polar opposites” relevant to the marketing issues at hand. For example, for a widely advertised brand that seeks to identify the ideal mix of brand image and offer call-to-action, the polar opposites might be: Brand <–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––> Offer Or if research points to hidden psychological motivators, we might want to set our polar opposites as: Rational <–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––> Emotional These are but two examples of a nearly infinite range of choices. The purpose is simply to frame the creative dialogue with end-points.
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
< previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||